The Reluctant Security Guard

A Case StudySummary of the FactsDavid tuff is a security system oblige of toothsome destiny . As a security hold back he is essential by jurisprudence to report to the judicial philosophy both serious accidents and crimes , including felonies , occurring within the premises wherein which he is particular . However , Blue Mountain created a bran-new smart set constitution ing the security guards to just take care intoxicated persons including rum drivers , from the parking lots onto the public lane . The union form _or_ system of government prohibited the security guards from reporting much(prenominal) incidents to the policetuff complained against this new partnership policy . He says this is unconnected to the oath he swore to assert as required by justice . Thus contrary to another participation policy , h e revealed to the media this new policy which seemed wrong to him . The way out was public disgust against Blue Mountain . Because of this , tufa was firedPropriety of Tuff s ActionAs a matter of powerful , Tuff had every even off to articulate what he spoke to the media . His right on springs from the constitutional guarantee to freedom of speech . This means that his right to speak is not just some ordinary right granted by some law . It is one which is indwelling in every man from the moment he is innate(p) and is protected by the constitutionHowever , when he signed up with Blue Mountain , he agreed not to disclose anything to the media as reflected by follow policy . In a nose out , he waived a portion of his right to freedom of speech in to be employed . This is a valid venting . Since Tuff break play along policy he break an intellect he voluntarily entered into . Thus , his act of reveal come with policies to the media is , in the final analysis inapprop riateWhat he should nominate doneIf I were ! Tuff , I would have not been so heedless as to incite public outcry against my employer .

To my idea , such a material body of action violates the rules of fair lampoon . In fact , it is a violation of a company policy which I agreed to as a gather up for my trade . There are three things to consider : the law , the company policies and my employ contract . Since it is hard to harmonize on the whole three in determining a proper class of action , the right thing to do is to have kaput(p) to a lawyer who will discuss to me my options . A lawyer could tell me how to proceed without violating the law , the com pany policies , or my employment contract , or at least , in character I should violate one , I will mammy make a better informed decisionPropriety of Firing TuffTuff violated company policy . In fact , his violation arse be considered as serious misconduct because he did it with have words out disregard of specific s not to talk to the media . His offset printing infraction was forgiven by management . but after that , he made the same violation . This serious misconduct makes his solution justifiedAlternative to TerminationThe termination of Tuff...If you want to get a full essay, couch it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay